Three years ago Saleet asked me a great question: Why don't you marry Oren?
There are two obvious wrong answers to that question: 1. Because I/we are straight 2. Because Oren is married (which was not the case at the time).
I became further confused today, as I was arguing that their is no essential difference between the two sexes. If that is the case, why can't two men marry, raise a family and have children with a close female friend? Why does the mother of the child necessarily need to be part of the "nuclear" family? If men and women really are the same, is the reason for marriage purely utilitarian, i.e. it is just more practical to have the mother of the child serve as the second parent? Religious doctrine aside, why must sex (v) be confined to/part of marriage?
My only answer now (that I have proved to my self, through contradiction) is that there is generally does exist a distinction between the sexes, which is not a conclusion I am all-together happy with.
Blackbird singing in the dead of night
13 years ago
6 comments:
Zev, Are you completely off your rocker?
Yehuda, yes, I am off my rocker in many different senses. Do you care to specify which sense you mean?
NFL, you may be driving at something very deep, following a trajectory of an argument that women and men are very similar, except for very small differences, that are all together irrelevant, save for the realm of marriage. But I don't exactly see how that argument would play out.
If, however, you are making an argument of Smithian Specialization, I am a bit lost. My point was that even if women are slightly better than men at housecleaning, it is irrelevant in upper-middle class America. When resources are scarce, it makes perfect sense to have the bearer of children the same one who raises them (and helps around the house, etc). But in a world where it is just as easy to higher a nanny (or an Au Pair, as has been done for centuries in England), why is it necessary to marry a woman for those tasks? But certainly you cannot believe that epsilon provides and essential reason for marriage between a man and a women?
(Purely for sport now, in a country like England where the rich never reserved sex for marriage, and highered servants to do all the cleaning, cooking and raising of the children, it is a wonder that conventional marriage lasted as long as it has.)
To clarify, I am not arguing against gay marriage. I am trying to find a rationale for conventional marriage and family structure.
zev, my first reaction is somewhere with yehuda. i have no idea what you're trying to say.
but one thing:
for most normal "middle class" people it is NOT simple (or within reach) to hire someone to do the bulk of the "household" work (cooking, cleaning, childrearing). the world in which one option is really "just as easy" as the other is very small.
as for the body of your question, i don't even know where to begin.
call me for a rant...
...
ok, fine, al regel ahat:
there is a qualitative difference in a relationship when one's romantic partner is also one's practical-living and family-making partner. why should people want to separate the two?
Now, the better question for you is: does the mere fact that many people seem to have differential sexual (and romantic) preferences for members of one gender (their own or not) over the other imply "that there is generally does exist (sic) a distinction between the sexes?"
actually, before/after you answer that, clarfiy what sort of "distinction" you mean. i mean, there are some very obvious material differences (organs and chromosomes present/absent, for example...*) but you still think it's meaningful on some level to say that men and women are the "same." so what sort of same-ness are you talking about, and does differrential sexual attraction destroy it?
*not to get into the topic of "intersexuality" for the moment...
oh, and im yirtzeh Hashem by you ;)
Zev, is there an inverse of trolling? I feel like it would be rude of me not to comment onthis, but alas the work bell just rang so I am going home. Perhaps when I reach my apartment I will have something to say. Unlike the rest of the lazy folks here, I do think I followed your questions...
Why does it bother you to say that there are differences between the sexes?
Post a Comment