So I post this because it is kind of my weekly pre-shabbes phone call with my grandmother. We talk for thirty seconds or so, you know how're things? Judy? Gabby? Grandkids? Who comes to visit, who has already called, who she's still waiting on. That's all warm up these days, a cacophony before the concert. Then we get down to business. McCain will be better for Israel. He will be stronger in Iran. But hasn't the no negotiation policy failed (well, actually I believe it has run its course, neither here nor there)? What about McCain's tax policy, do you really think the middle class does not deserve tax breaks? Foreign dictators will try and test Obama, McCain is a greater deterrent. And so forth.
The point it, while Silverman is funny, I actually think she's wrong. We are on different sides of the issues. My grandmother favors hard power over soft power (having seen it work during the Holocaust) and I prefer soft power, and military engagement somewhere way down the line (but on that line, nonetheless). It's not just a matter of correcting the erroneous emails that she does not receive.
Oh yeah, and the fact that Fox News is her source for election coverage does not make the challenge any easier.
I am not a political scientist, so I can say the following. I do not believe in a distinction between soft and hard power. Soft power is supposed to be something like speaking softly while holding a big stick and it never works unless you have the stick. Even in your account, you need to have the threat of war on the line (if "way down" on that line).
1 comment:
I am not a political scientist, so I can say the following. I do not believe in a distinction between soft and hard power. Soft power is supposed to be something like speaking softly while holding a big stick and it never works unless you have the stick. Even in your account, you need to have the threat of war on the line (if "way down" on that line).
Post a Comment